GLM-5.2 — 가장 강력한 text-only 오픈웨이트, 이미지 입력 없이 WebDev 2위
Simon Willison
Z.ai의 GLM-5.2 — MIT 라이선스 오픈웨이트, 753B 파라미터·1.51TB MoE, 컨텍스트 100만 토큰(5.1의 20만에서 상승). Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v4.1에서 51점으로 오픈웨이트 1위(MiniMax-M3·DeepSeek V4 Pro 44, Kimi K2.6 43). 대신 태스크당 43k 출력 토큰으로 토큰을 많이 먹는다. Code Arena WebDev는 Claude Fable 5에 이어 2위 — 이미지 입력이 없는데도. OpenRouter 9개 프로바이더에서 대체로 입력 $1.40·출력 $4.40. 펠리컨은 훌륭했으나 오포섬은 5.1에서 크게 퇴보.
GLM-5.2 — 가장 강력한 text-only 오픈웨이트
생각 덩어리
스펙 — MIT 라이선스로 풀린 753B·1.51TB MoE
Chinese AI lab Z.ai released GLM-5.2 to their coding plan subscribers on June 13th, and then yesterday (June 16th) released the full open weights under an MIT license.
Similar in size to their previous GLM-5 and GLM-5.1 releases this is a 753B parameter, 1.51TB monster—with 40 active parameters (Mixture of Experts). ... GLM-5.2 has a 1 million token context window, up from GLM-5.1’s 200,000.
Intelligence Index 1위 — 51점으로 오픈웨이트 선두
GLM-5.2 is the leading open weights model on the Intelligence Index v4.1. At 51, it leads MiniMax-M3 (44), DeepSeek V4 Pro (max, 44) and Kimi K2.6 (43)
토큰을 많이 먹는다 — 태스크당 43k 출력
GLM-5.2 uses more output tokens per task than other leading open weights models: the model uses 43k output tokens per Intelligence Index task, up from GLM-5.1 (26k) and above MiniMax-M3 (24k), Kimi K2.6 (35k) and DeepSeek V4 Pro (max, 37k)
WebDev 2위의 반전 — 이미지 입력이 핵심이라는 통념을 깨다
The model is also now ranked 2nd on the Code Arena WebDev leaderboard, behind only Claude Fable 5. ... I’m impressed to see it rank so highly given the lack of image input, which I had incorrectly assumed was a key part of building a truly great frontend coding model.
가격 — OpenRouter 9곳, 입력 $1.40·출력 $4.40
I’ve been trying it out via OpenRouter, which has it from 9 different providers, almost all of which are charging $1.40/million for input and $4.40/million for output. For comparison, GPT-5.5 is $5/$30 and Claude Opus 4.5-4.8 is $5/$25.
훌륭한 펠리컨, 실망스러운 오포섬 — 5.1에서의 퇴보
It’s a self-contained fully animated SVG, and the animations aren’t broken! Often I’ll see eyes falling off or wheels rotating independently of the bicycle but here everything works great. It’s a very nice vector illustration of a pelican too. Very impressive.
This is such a step down from GLM-5.1!
5.2 didn’t even try to animate it.